State Council of Greece (ΣτΕ) gave, National Intelligence Service (ΕΥΠ) three-month play for transferring an authoritative record successful the lawsuit of lifting the confidentiality of a journalist’s communications Thanasis Koukakis.
The deadline begins to number aft work of the determination No. 709/2026 plenum ΣτΕwhich Greece’s highest administrative tribunal requires ΕΥΠ nonstop to the tribunal a implicit authoritative record related to the determination to assistance the confidentiality of the journalist’s communications. This is reported Mononews And Parapolitika.
What does the tribunal require?
We are talking astir the lawsuit of a writer Thanasis Koukakiswho is seeking to clarify the reasons why the determination was made to assistance the secrecy of his communications. Previously, spyware similar Predatormaking the lawsuit 1 of the cardinal parts of the Greek wiretapping scandal.
As I wrote earlier Kathimerini, ΣτΕ postponed the last determination connected the lawsuit and demanded ΕΥΠ transfer the full work record regarding the declassification of communications, arsenic well arsenic immoderate related documents.
The tribunal besides provided an important option: if ΕΥΠ declares that a record oregon idiosyncratic documents person been destroyed, the work indispensable officially bespeak under what regularisation this was done, and then guarantee that the record is restored and submitted to the court. That is, the look “the documents person disappeared, thank you everyone” doesn’t work present anymore. What a shame for lovers of administrative magic.
Why the Kukakis lawsuit is important
Case Kukakis has agelong gone beyond the idiosyncratic ailment of 1 journalist. It is connected with a wider ungraded astir wiretaps, work ΕΥΠthe relation of autarkic bodies and the use of spyware successful Greece.
The writer antecedently contacted Αρχή Διασφάλισης του Απορρήτου των Επικοινωνιών (ΑΔΑΕ, Office for Ensuring Communication Secrecy), demanding to cheque whether the secrecy of his communications was violated. He besides challenged the refusal ΕΥΠ transfer the applicable record to an autarkic authority.
Now ΣτΕ successful fact, it sets a specific deadline for the quality work and demands a documented response. This is important not lone for Koukakis himself, but besides for the full organization representation surrounding the scandal: if the quality work acted legally, the record should amusement the basis. If documents are destroyed, the tribunal demands an mentation of who did it, when and by what right.
Three months that tin amusement a lot
The caller three-month framework makes the contiguous play critical. ΕΥΠ Now she indispensable either manus implicit the materials oregon officially explicate the destiny of the file. In some cases, the lawsuit takes connected a caller dynamic: it moves from the zone of governmental statements and communal accusations to the zone of documentary control.
For the government, this story remains sensitive. The wiretapping ungraded has already damaged trust successful authorities institutions, and the journalist’s lawsuit Kukakis became 1 of the symbols of the question to which the authorities ne'er gave a convincing nationalist answer: who, why and connected what ground was spying connected journalists, politicians and nationalist figures.
Legal request for ΕΥΠ does not mean automatic designation of the illegality of the service’s actions. But it means something else: the state tin nary longer bounds itself to vague references to nationalist security. If there was a morganatic crushed for lifting the secrecy of communications, it should beryllium recorded successful documents. If there are nary documents, this is simply a abstracted problem, and nary little serious.
Editorial comment
Solution ΣτΕ connected concern Thanasis Koukakis – this is simply a δοκιμή not lone for ΕΥΠbut besides for the full Greek system of organization control. In a antiauthoritarian state, an quality work cannot beryllium a achromatic container into which decisions to wiretap journalists disappear, and then from where lone the operation comes retired “national security”.
If the state interfered with a journalist’s confidential communications, it is obliged to explicate connected what ground this was done. If a record is destroyed, the nationalist has a close to cognize who authorized it and why. Otherwise, the combat against “security threats” too easy turns into a convenient surface for arbitrariness. And screens, arsenic you know, are bully successful the theater, but look atrocious where instrumentality and power indispensable work.
Greek (GR) · 
English (US) ·