Elon Musk sharply criticized the film’s casting “Odyssey” Christopher Nolansaying the manager was “a disgrace to Homer” and the Greek heritage.
The main crushed for the ungraded was the accusation that a achromatic woman Lupita Nyong’o will play Helen of Troyas well arsenic reports and rumors surrounding information successful the movie Elliot Page.
According to Variety, Musk criticized the movie again “Odyssey”stating that Nolan allegedly made such decisions for the involvement of awards and compliance with Hollywood standards diversity. According to the publication, Lupita Nyong’o should play successful the movie Helen of Troy And Clytemnestra.
In 1 of the publications successful X Musk wrote that Christopher Nolan “disgraces Homer’s grave”. In different remark, helium stated that the manager “cruelly insults the Greeks”. These statements besides mention Entertainment Weekly And Deadline.
The ungraded began aft comments by an American blimpish publicist Matt Walshwho stated that supposedly nary 1 believes that Lupita Nyong’o tin play “the astir beauteous woman successful the world”. According to Walsh, Nolan I didn’t situation take a white actress for fearfulness of being accused of racism. Musk publically agreed with this thesis, writing: “This is true”.
Elon Musk is bashing Christopher Nolan for #TheOdyssey casting, alleging the manager formed Lupita Nyong’o arsenic Helen of Troy due to the fact that helium “wants the awards.”
In further X posts, Musk re-tweeted posts that mocked Elliot Page’s masculinity and claimed that Nolan was stomping all… pic.twitter.com/rhMoaZNCXM
— Variety (@Variety) May 13, 2026
What is known astir the casting
“Odyssey” Christopher Nolan – 1 of the astir anticipated films 2026. The formed includes Matt Damon, Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson, Zendaya, Charlize Theron, Lupita Nyong’o and others. According to People, Matt Damon plays OdysseyA Anne Hathaway — Penelope.
? ¡Es official! Elon Musk ataca a Christopher Nolan por su casting inclusivo en ‘La Odisea’. ¿Esto el inicio de una nueva controversia? #ElonMusk #ChristopherNolan https://t.co/l8UBPs3Zk7
— Softonic (ES) (@softonic_es) May 14, 2026
Roles Elliot Page person not been afloat officially disclosed, but a abstracted wave of speculation has already arisen astir his information successful the film. Some commentators connected κοινωνικά networks claimed that helium could play Achillesbut this accusation has not been confirmed. It was these rumors that became different crushed for attacks from Mask and right-wing blimpish commentators, arsenic helium writes astir The Hollywood Reporter.
The movie should beryllium released July 17, 2026. According to manufacture publications, this is simply a big-budget adaptation of the past Greek epic, filmed for the format IMAX. That is, the quality flared up adjacent earlier the afloat merchandise of the film, which is astir the norm for Hollywood: archetypal they combat implicit casting, then implicit the script, then implicit the container office, and somewhere successful the extremity someone remembers that the movie should beryllium seen astatine all.
Musk’s argument: Homer, the Greeks and woke standards
The essence of the claims Mask boils down to the information that Nolanin his opinion, distorts the representation of Homeric characters successful bid to conscionable the modern requirements of Hollywood. The billionaire claims that the manager allegedly makes such casting decisions for the involvement of awards and eligibility criteria. diversitywhich run within Oscar.
Really, American Film Academy from 2024 requires that films applying for “Oscar” successful class “Best Film”met astatine slightest two of the 4 standards of practice and inclusion. These rules are officially published connected the ιστότοπος Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
However, automatically asserting that a peculiar casting determination Nolan dictated precisely by these rules, it is impossible. This is the version Mask and his supporters, and not a proven fact. Myself Nolanat slightest for now, has not stated that it chose its actors to conscionable Oscar standards. And present begins the good enactment betwixt disapproval of an creator determination and governmental interpretation, which the Internet, arsenic usual, crosses with a bulldozer.
Why was the quality so heated?
For Greek audiences the topic is particularly sensitive. “Odyssey” – not conscionable literate worldly for the adjacent blockbuster. This is 1 of the cardinal texts of past Greek culture, associated with Homermythology, language, humanities representation and European civilization. Therefore, immoderate noticeable alteration successful acquainted images is perceived not arsenic a neutral casting, but arsenic an interference successful taste heritage.
This is particularly true Helen of Troy. In the European tradition, it has been presented for centuries arsenic a symbol of exceptional beauty, astir which the story of Trojan War. Therefore, the prime of an histrion for this relation inevitably becomes not lone an artistic, but besides a symbolic gesture.
Here I am, speechmaking Homer’s Odyssey straight from the Greek text and thinking astir however overmuch Christopher Nolan disrespected us. Don’t wage for the movie. Resist this slowly dying docket that is rotting our societies. Hollywood is dead. pic.twitter.com/f9hLbUTAbi
— Homer Pavlos (@HomerPavlos) May 13, 2026
Critics Nolan asks a elemental but achy question: if Hollywood is making a movie astir the Greek epic, why does it think it is acceptable to radically alteration the visual individuality of characters associated with the past Greek tradition? And if we were talking, for example, astir a movie astir Shakuthe large king of the Zulu, would the manager take a white, blue-eyed histrion for this role? An unpleasant question, but an honorable one. Sometimes symmetry is the champion way to δοκιμή principles.
Supporters of such casting reply differently: Homer – this is simply a myth, not a documentary passport bureau of the Bronze Age; cinema has the close to creator interpretation; the quality and representation of a quality bash not person to beryllium reduced to the taste root of the actress. In addition, they constituent retired that successful the past tradition, characters were reinterpreted galore times, and modern movie adaptations inevitably speak the connection of their time.
Where is the enactment betwixt mentation and substitution?
The occupation is that some sides of the statement aren’t conscionable talking astir movies. Casting for some Lupita Nyong’o is an illustration of an imposed docket successful which taste authenticity gives way to governmental fashion. For others the absorption Mask and right-wing commentators – an illustration of different run against diversity, where an creator determination is instantly declared an insult to civilization.
But there is simply a third, calmer question: however acold tin directorial state spell when working with the taste practice of different people? Hollywood has agelong been accustomed to treating different people’s myths arsenic earthy worldly for the planetary market. Sometimes it turns retired to beryllium a almighty movie. Sometimes it is simply a beauteous product, successful which lone names, decorations and the selling aroma of antiquity stay from the archetypal culture.
In lawsuit “Odyssey” Nolan faced precisely this risk. He takes a text that for the Greeks and much broadly for European civilization is not conscionable a plot, but a portion of civilizational memory. Therefore, audiences will measure not lone the direction, special effects and acting, but besides however overmuch the movie respects the archetypal world Homer.
Editorial comment
Scandal astir “Odyssey” Christopher Nolan shows that the quality is astir woke-summons successful Hollywood has agelong gone beyond the American civilization war. When it comes to Homer, Helen of Troy and past Greek heritage, the question becomes broader: who has the close to reinterpret taste representation and where does creator state end?
Muskof course, formulates his claims rudely and demonstratively. This is the whole style of modern X: less arguments, much catchphrases so that the algorithm doesn’t get bored. But the topic itself is not constricted to his harshness. Behind it lies the existent irritation of a portion of the audience, which sees successful such decisions not art, but different effort by Hollywood to rewrite someone else’s tradition to its ain ideological standards.
At the aforesaid time, it is important not to spell to the other extreme. Cinema is not a depository showcase, but an creation form. The manager has the close to interpretation, but the histrion does not person to lucifer the representation that the viewer has seen for decades successful schoolhouse illustrations. But if the manager takes connected Homerhe indispensable understand: this is not conscionable “content” for worldwide distribution. It is simply a text that has taste heirs, humanities sensitivity, and a close to respect.
Therefore, the main question to to Nolan will not beryllium astir what colour the actors’ skin is, but whether helium tin propulsion disconnected “Odyssey” similar a superior work astir the Greek epic, and not similar an costly Hollywood operation set, where antiquity is used arsenic a spectacular backdrop. If the movie is strong, some of the contention will subside. If not, the casting will go a symbol of a broader complaint: Hollywood has erstwhile again taken someone else’s bequest to tell a story not astir them, but astir itself.
And that’s why Greek assemblage reaction will beryllium particularly important. For Hollywood “Odyssey” — project, premiere, container bureau and imaginable awards. For the Greeks this is Homer. The difference, arsenic they say, is not small. Although explaining this to an manufacture that knows however to turn everything into a franchise is astir heroic.
Greek (GR) · 
English (US) ·