Maria Caristianu and writer Thanasis Avgerinos filed a suit against Nikos Karahalios due to the fact that of the statement “Moscow’s instructions”.
Maria Caristianu and writer Thanasis Avgerinos filed a suit against the party’s erstwhile governmental readying caput New Democracy Nikos Karahaliosaccusing him of slander.
The crushed was nationalist statements Karahalios that the caller governmental task Maria Karistianu supposedly created by “instructions from Moscow”. A writer was besides implicated successful these allegations Thanasis Avgerinoswho worked arsenic a analogous successful Moscow for galore years.
According to SKAITuesday greeting Karystiana And Avgerinos came to the constabulary station Syntagma and filed a suit against Karahalios for mendacious and defamatory statements. Similar accusation was provided Newsit, Ta Nea And The T.O.C..
What Karahalios claimed
The time earlier Nikos Karahalios published message to X, where helium stated that Karystiana allegedly received “instruction from Moscow/Avgerinos” instantly start creating a party. This work was quoted by Greek media, including Proto Theme And Efsyn.
After that Karystiana And Avgerinos demanded that Karahalios provided grounds of his claims. According to the contented of the claim, if helium cannot corroborate the words astir the alleged “indication”the procedures provided for by instrumentality will beryllium continued against him.
Autoforo and questions to the police
Greek publications besides bespeak that the suit specifically mentions the duration of the process autoforo – detentions without delay. According to Proto Themethe applicants noted that this play expires successful 12:00and raised the question of whether the indispensable actions had been taken to hunt for Karahalios.
Greek media reports besides incorporate disapproval of ΕΛ.ΑΣ. And Ministry of Citizen Protection regarding the effect to the filed lawsuit. Here, however, it is important not to get up of the court: for present we are talking astir the statements of the parties and the opening of the ineligible procedure, and not astir proven guilt. Yes, it’s boring. But then you won’t person to unreal that the editors confused the tribunal with a java store of governmental rumors.
Political background
This story comes amid reports of the instauration of a caller political task Maria Karistianuwhich aft the tragedy successful Tempi has go 1 of the astir notable nationalist figures successful Greece. Formed astir her serious κοινωνικά capital: the trust of some citizens, affectional support for the families of the victims and the representation of a idiosyncratic who is not included successful the usual enactment system.
That is why immoderate talk astir her imaginable governmental question inevitably causes a tense reaction. For aged enactment mechanisms this fig is uncomfortable: it does not person a classical enactment apparatus, but it has recognition, a protestation complaint and a motivation statement associated with the request for justness successful the lawsuit Tempi.
Against this background, the statement Nikos Karahalios astir supposedly “Moscow’s instructions” looks not conscionable similar a crisp governmental remark, but similar an effort to instantly spot a caller task successful the toxic model of outer influence. It’s aged and rather primitive scheme: alternatively of discussing the program, κοινωνικά basal and governmental goals, the nationalist is asked to search “hand of Moscow”.
But there is simply a cardinal constituent here. If you Karahalios there is evidence, helium indispensable contiguous it. Then the situation could truly go a superior occupation for Karystiana And Thanasis Avgerinos. If there is nary evidence, the prosecution should not onslaught them, but the writer of the statement himself. In this case, we are not talking astir governmental exposure, but about stuffing designed to pull sound and suspicion.
Attack connected Avgerinos Also doesn’t look random. His galore years of work arsenic a analogous successful Russia marque him a convenient target for those who want to regenerate talk of facts with a elemental hint: since a idiosyncratic worked successful Moscow and reported from Russia, it means that helium tin beryllium presented arsenic portion of someone else’s governmental game. This is convenient but unsafe logic. It turns journalistic acquisition into a stigma alternatively than a nonrecreational biographical fact.
However, successful existent politics, of course, even unsubstantiated accusations tin permission a mark. A governmental statement lives not lone done facts, but besides done repetition. They punctuation him, sermon him, refute him – and thereby assistance him summation a foothold successful the nationalist sphere. That’s why the suit Karystiana And Avgerinos looks similar an effort to stop this mechanics astatine an aboriginal stage and unit the writer of the prosecution to permission the zone of hints and participate the zone of evidence.
Now the question is rather simple: either Karahalios will corroborate his words with facts, oregon the whole story will stay an illustration of how, successful the pre-election atmosphere, dense governmental accusations used arsenic a tool to discredit. And successful this lawsuit the occupation will nary longer beryllium Karystiana and not successful Avgerinosbut arsenic a governmental struggle itself, where alternatively of arguments they again take retired the aged sign: “It’s Putin’s fault”.
Greek (GR) · 
English (US) ·